IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19779 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2025 Thana- DHORAIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Umesh Yadav Son of Safendar Yadav @ Sakendar Yadav Resident of Village- Velay, P.S.- Dhoraiya, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 29-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case No.325 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 115 (2), 126(2), 109(2), 117(2), 351 and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 15.11.2025 at 7 P.M. Umesh (petitioner) and Kumud were plying their tractor in front of his house, on objection that they should not ply the tractor as his cow was sitting, on which, they abused and assaulted, further on alarm, nine named accused persons came and Kumud assaulted by lathi causing injury over left eye of the informant, thereafter Umesh Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19779 of 2026(4) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 (petitioner) assaulted his mother by lathi causing injury on head and Safindar assaulted by lathi causing injury on hand and Saurav assaulted his father by brick causing injury on head. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that on account of trivial dispute of plying tractor the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is further submitted that since informant objected plying of tractor, as such an altercation took place, in which both side assaulted each other. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then petitioner is not alleged to have repeated the blow. It is further submitted that from side of the petitioner, Dhoraiya P.S. Case No.326 of 2025 dated 28.11.2025 has been instituted against the informant and his side. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the mother of the informant by lathi causing injury on head and the injury has been opined to be grievous in nature and head is a vital part of the body. It is also submitted that since an FIR has been instituted from the side of the petitioner though subsequent to the instant FIR but then that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19779 of 2026(4) dt.29-06-2026 3/3 amply demonstrates that an altercation had taken place in which mother of the informant was assaulted leading to grievous injury. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the informant, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T