APHC010233092013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8124/2013 Between: 1. GUNJA DURGA BHAVANI,, D/OJAYA NAGESWARA RAO, W/O. T. NARASIMHA RAO, UNEMPIOYEE, R/O.H.NO.2-31 "A" COLONY CENTRE, BRILLIANT SCHOOL STREET, IBRAHIMPATNAM POST AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. HEAVY MACHINERY & ENGINEERING LTD., KONDAPALLI, IBRAHIMPATNAM HANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 2. THE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, O/O. DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 1. in not allowing the petitioner to appear for Written Test/Interview for selection and appointment to the post of Clerk is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of India reported in 1996(6) Scale, 676 and consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for selection and appointment to the post of Clerk without insisting that the name of the petitioner should be sponsored by the Employment Exchange 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 10179 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responder is to permit the petitioner to appear for Written Test/Interview for selection and appointment to the post of Clerk pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B P RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING 2. J PRABHAKAR The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 11.03.2026 PNS