Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20667 (JHR)

SANDIP KUMAR @ NICKY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6600/2026 · 2026-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:21301] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6600 of 2026 ------ Sandip Kumar @ Nicky aged about 26 years, Son of Tirender Prasad Mehta, Resident of Village-Hadari, P.O. & P.S. Ichak, Dist.- Hazaribag (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No. 31 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 21(b), 22(b), 27(a) & 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegally selling brown sugar; which is also known as heroin. It is further submitted that from the possession of the co-accused persons total 14 grams of brown sugar has been recovered and the only allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner was a supplier of brown sugar to the co- accused persons. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the recovered quantity of brown sugar comes under intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 01.07.2026 in B.A. No. 5863 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.05.2026 as mentioned in para-15. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-Cum-Spl, Judge NDPS Act, Hazaribag in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No. 31 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17 /07/2026 Amar/