APHC010236022014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1129/2014 Between: 1. CHITTIPROLU SAI BABU,, S/O NARADA BRAHMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC:RECORD ASSISTANT R/O 22/36-1 BATCHUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI JAGADESH SHARMA LAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF AP, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI Y ANURADHA LAS, COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TILAK ROAD, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, RAMARAOPETA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SRI CH HANUMANTH RAO, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, RAMARAOPETA, KAKINADA. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SRI CH DURGA PRASAD, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNERPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI V SRINIVASA RAO, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, BATCHUPETA, 2 MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. SRI J VINOD KUMAR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI PEDDINTI AMMAVARI TEMPLE, KOLLETIKOTA VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful, intentional and deliberate violation of the orders dated 28.4.2014 passed in W.P.No. 13030 of 2014 by His Lordship Sri Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B S N NAIDU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. V T M PRASAD 3. P RAJANI REDDY 4. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.13030 of 2014 was withdrawn by this Court by an order dated 13.11.2018. In view of the said order and the withdrawal of the writ petition, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:18.03.2026 PNS