Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20666 (AP)

Bitrgunta Naresh Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10584/2019 · 2026-01-22

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010237652019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10584/2019 Between: 1. BITRGUNTA NARESH BABU, S/O. JANARDHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- SOFT WARE ENGINEER, R/O. DOOR NO.5-4/1, EAST ROAD, PHIRANGIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL,GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PHIRANGIPURAM POLICE STATION, PHIRANGIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in acting on the complaint, dated 18-07-2019 and registering the crime against Bollapalli Satish, Venkat, Turakapalem Chinna, Sankar, Rama Rao, Chandrasekhar Reddy, Yugandhar Madanmohan Rao as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of 2 India and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to act on the compliant, dated 18-07-2019 submitted by me and take action on the same IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to act on the compliant, dated 18-07-2019 submitted by me and take appropriate action on the same, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10584 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the writ petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the report submitted by the petitioner dated 18.07.2019, police registered a case in Crime No.148 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 420, 324, 506 r/w 34 IPC on 06.08.2019 on the file of Phirangipuram Police Station, Guntur District, and investing into the case and they will file report before the Magistrate after completion of the investigation. He would further submit that the writ petition was filed alleging that police did not register F.I.R. and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In the light of above submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, as police already registered F.I.R. pending the writ petition, no further orders are required and the Writ Petition can be disposed of as infructuous, without going into merits of the case. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 23.01.2026 Pmk 4 22 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:10584 OF 2019 Date: 23.01.2026 Pmk