Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20665 (KAR)

SRI SAMPATH KUMAR B L v. SRI DEEPAK VIJAY CHAWLA

CRL.RP/646/2026 · 2026-06-10

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28219 CRL.RP No. 646 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2026 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SAMPATH KUMAR B L S/O LOKESH B R AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO. 433/30/1, 3RD FLOOR, 10TH MAIN, 20TH A CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESHWARI M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI DEEPAK VIJAY CHAWLA DIRECTOR OF GOLDEN ACES PVT LTD., REG OFFICE AT NO. 71/1, OLD AIRPORT ROAD, DOMLURU, BANGALORE - 560071 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, (CCH-61) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28219 CRL.RP No. 646 of 2026 IN CRL.APP. NO. 1187/2024, VIDE ITS ORDER DATED : 19-01- 2026, BY CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE XXI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY ) IN CC NO. 3379/2016, VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 11-11-2019. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner is absent. 2. This Court vide order dated 22.04.2026 suspended the sentence subject to revision petitioner depositing 50% of the fine amount inclusive of the amount already deposited, if any, before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks from today and the notice issued to respondent was not returned. However, in terms of postal track sheet, it is mentioned that ‘insufficient address’. 3. On perusal of records received by this Court, the conditional order was not complied till today and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28219 CRL.RP No. 646 of 2026 hence, question of considering this revision does not arise and moreover, the matter is not yet admitted. Accordingly, the revision petition stands dismissed in view of non-compliance of the said conditional order. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9