[2026:RJ-JP:4622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8135/2025 1. Arihant Chauhan son of Shri Devi Singh Chauhan, resident of 101/158, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur- 302020 2. Devi Singh Chauhan son of Shri Tejpal Singh Chauhan, resident of 101/158, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur- 302020 3. Smt. Nirmala Chauhan w/of Shri Devi Singh Chauhan, resident of 101/158, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur- 302020 4. Harshit Chauhan son of Shri Devi Singh Chauhan, resident of 101/158, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur- 302020 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Barkha Chauhan d/of Shri Narayan Singh Chauhan w/of Shri Arihant Chauhan, Resident son of 309, A.k. Gopalan Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S Gaharana For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Nitesh Dadhich & Ms. Ritu Somani HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.432/2025 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (Jaipur West), District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan) for [2026:RJ-JP:4622] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-8135/2025] offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 298, 384, 504, 406, 420 & 120B of IPC along with subsequent proceedings. 2. The petitioner No.1 and complainant-respondent No.2 are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was matrimonial dispute between the parties. Counsel submits that the parties have entered into compromise. Counsel submits that petitioner No.1 and complainant are going to file an application under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act for mutual divorce. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:4622] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-8135/2025] 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.432/2025 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (Jaipur West), District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan) along with subsequent proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /113