Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20663 (JHR)

GOKUL MISTRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1370/2023 · 2026-07-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21249] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1370 of 2023 ------ 1. Gokul Mistri @ Gokul Prasad Sharma, aged about 72 years, son of – Hari Mistri; 2. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, aged about 35 years, son of Gokul Sharma; 3. Basudeo Mistri @ Basdev Mistri, aged about 58 years, son of Hadi Rath Mistri; 4. Sonu Kumar Sharma @ Sonu Sharma, aged about 32 years, son of Basudeo Mistri; 5. Chandan Sharma, aged about 26 years, son of Basudeo Mistri; 6. Monu Sharma, aged about 28 years, son of Basudeo Mistri; 7. Montu Sharma, aged about 38 years, son of Gulten Mistri; 8. Sukhdeo Prasad Sharma, aged about 55 years, son of Badri Prasad Sharma; 9. Ram Chandra Mistri, aged about 67 years, son of Shyam Lal Mistri; 10. Gautam Sharma, aged about 41 years, son of Ram Chandra Sharma; 11. Uttam Sharma @ Uttam Kumar Sharma, aged about 36 years, son of Ram Chandra Sharma; 12. Suresh Mistri @ Suresh Sharma, aged about 48 years, son of Doman Badai; 13. Naresh Kumar Bishwakarma @ Samij Sharma, aged about 34 years, son of Doman Badai; 14. Sudhir Sharma, aged about 32 years, son of Lekhraj Mistri; All resident of village- Koradih, P.O.- Pradhankhanta, P.S.- Topchanchi, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand 15. Teklal Badhi @ Teklal Sharma, aged about 57 years, son of Dharam Mistri, resident of Adarsh Colony, Behiyardih, P.O.- Jhagrahi, P.S.- Madhuban District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sunita Devi, aged about 42 years, wife of – Kashi Mistri, Rio- Koradih, P.O.- Pradhankhanta, P.S.- Topchanchi, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-09 Dated:-18-07-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw this Cr.M.P. Permission is accorded. This Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 18.07.2026-Animesh/