1 ( 2026:HHC:35827 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 758 of 2026 Decided on: 24.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Sandhya Devi ....Petitioner Versus Narinder Pal Singh & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 22.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated respondent No. 3 has sanctioned family pension in favour of the petitioner vide PPO No. 1126170796, dated 10.07.2026 and the matter now rests with the Office of District Treasury Office, Chamba for release of family pension to the petitioner. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35827 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 3. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available to her under the law. 4. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 24th August, 2026 Judge (raman)