Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20660 (JHR)

RAHUL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6593/2026 · 2026-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21305] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6593 of 2026 ------ Rahul Yadav, aged about 20 years, Son of Sukhlal Yadav @ Sukhal Yadav, resident of Khaira Tola, Jamuniya, Near Prabandhak School, P.O. and P.S. Bhitaha, Bagaha (Bettiah), District-West Champaran, State-Bihar. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate. For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)B/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of Ganja and total 15 kg/- of Ganja was recovered from the possession of the petitioner; which comes under intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.05.2026 as mentioned in para-20 and has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 19 of the bail application and though charge-sheet has already been submitted but none of the witnesses has been examined as yet. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, (NDPS Act), Jamshedpur in connection with Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17 /07/2026 Amar/