APHC010227952019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 10087/2019 Between: 1. BOYELLA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. LATE NARASAIAH, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. GAJULARAMARAM, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD. 2. BOYELLA VENKATA RAMANAMMA, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. GAJULARAMARAM,- KUKATPALLY. HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAVALI RURAL CIRCLE, KAVALI TOWN. SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JALUDANKI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. BOYELLA ASWINI, W/O. SURENDRA BABU, AGED 25 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, JALADANKI MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10087 OF 2019 ORDER: No one appeared for the writ petitioners either physically or through video conference. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the report of the 6th respondent, police registered a case in Cr.No.74/2019 of Jaladanki Police Station on 04.05.2019 against the petitioners and others for the offence U/s.498-A IPC and U/secs.3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Later, laid charge sheet vide C.C.No.154/2022 on the file of Addl.Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Kavali against the petitioners and another. The learned Magistrate conducted trial and on merits, acquitted the petitioners and another for the above offence, and therefore, the writ petition becomes infructuous. 3. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further orders are required at this length of time, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.02.2026 PSK 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 70 WRIT PETITION No:10087 OF 2019 Date: 06.02.2026 W PSK