APHC010230272024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2933/2024 Between: 1. BATCHU PATTABI RAM PRASAD, S/0 JAGANNATHA DASU, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, K NARASIMHA RAO, S/0 K MADHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/0 11 NO.6, SRK PURAM, SAROOR NAGAR, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, STATE OF TELANGANA. 1. T SIVA SANKARA RAO IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. P PRAVEEN KUMAR, , TAHSILDAR, ATCHAMPETA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. ARUN BABU IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 4. SRINIVASA YADAV, TAHSILDAR ATCHAMPETA MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH RR 3 AND 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 30 01 2025 VIDE I A NO 2 OF 2024 IN C C NO 2933 OF 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under contempt of courts act for IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2933/2024 BATCHU PATTABI RAM PRASAD, S/0 JAGANNATHA DASU, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, K NARASIMHA RAO, S/0 K MADHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/0 11-12 NO.6, SRK PURAM, SAROOR NAGAR, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, STATE OF TELANGANA. ...PETITIONER AND T SIVA SANKARA RAO IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. P PRAVEEN KUMAR, , TAHSILDAR, ATCHAMPETA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ARUN BABU IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALNADU DISTRICT RADESH SRINIVASA YADAV, TAHSILDAR ATCHAMPETA MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH RR 3 AND 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 30 01 2025 VIDE I A NO 2 OF 2024 IN C C NO 2933 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under contempt of courts act for IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BATCHU PATTABI RAM PRASAD, S/0 JAGANNATHA DASU, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, K NARASIMHA RAO, S/0 K 12-359, ROAD NO.6, SRK PURAM, SAROOR NAGAR, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER T SIVA SANKARA RAO IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU P PRAVEEN KUMAR, , TAHSILDAR, ATCHAMPETA MANDAL, ARUN BABU IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALNADU DISTRICT SRINIVASA YADAV, TAHSILDAR ATCHAMPETA MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH RR 3 AND 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 30 01 2025 VIDE I A ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under contempt of courts act for 2 disobedience of the orders passed in WP No. 29834 of 2023 dated 05.12.2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the Order in WP No. 29834 of 2023 dated 05.12.2023 in the above writ and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the instant application and implead the present implead respondents 3 and 4 as party respondent No.3 and 4 to the present Contempt Case No.2933 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3 The Court made the following order: Sri S.Raja Sekhar, learned counsel, representing Sri V.Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that pursuant to the filing of this Contempt Case, the respondent authorities have passed order on the petitioner’s representation and the petitioner intends to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum. Hence, prays to close the Contempt Case giving liberty to the petitioner to question the said order before the appropriate forum. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to question the said order before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 23.03.2026 MP 4 86 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:2933 of 2024 Date: 23.03.2026 MP