Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20654 (BOM)

JAYSHREE ALIAS BHIMABAI ANIL MORE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/4767/2025 · 2026-10-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4767 OF 2025 JAYSHREE ALIAS BHIMABAI ANIL MORE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4441 OF 2025 BHAIRAV ALIAS BAHIRU LAXMAN MORE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Mr.R.G.Narwade, Advocate for the Applicants in Cri.Appl.No. 4767/2025. Mr.S.K.Shirse, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr.S.E.Shekade, Advocate for Applicants in Cri.Appl.No.4441/2025 and Advocate for Respondent No.2 in Cri.Appl.No.4767/2025. ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 13th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. In pursuance to the order dated 31.07.2026, the parties were directed to appear before the learned Registrar (Judicial) to execute their separate affidavit of compromise. Accordingly, the parties appeared on 10.08.2026 before the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and executed their separate affidavits. The learned Registrar (Judicial) also issued the report of compromise between the Applicants khs/Oct.2026/4767 2026:BHC-AUG:49187-DB - 2 - and Respondent No.2. The affidavit of Respondent No.2 discloses that he was the original informant in Crime No.577/2025 dated 07.07.2025 registered with Ahilyanagar Taluka Police Station for the offences punishable u/s 118(2), 115, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 189(2), 191(2), 190, 191(3) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. It further states that due to intervention of common relatives, the differences between them have been amicably settled and they do not want to continue with the criminal case and further Respondent No.2 also claims that he is not having any objection if the criminal proceedings are quashed. 3. In that view of the matter, Criminal Applications are allowed. FIR in both these criminal applications are quashed and set aside. The Applicants/Accused be set free, if not on bail and not required in any other crime. 4. These applications are disposed of, as such. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Oct.2026/4767