Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20649 (PNJ)

M/S GODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

CWP/19871/2020 · 2026-05-21

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Union of India and another CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. S.S.Saron, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Advocate, Mr. Sourabh for the respondents. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the parties be disposed of in terms of Division Bench of this Court Union of India In light of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in weeks are granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal May 21, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.174 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19871 Date of Decision : M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Versus Union of India and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. S.S.Saron, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Advocate, Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate, for the respondents. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that this petition be disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 09.01.202 Division Bench of this Court in CWP-12766 Union of India and others. In light of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in K.K.Entriprises’s case (supra) weeks are granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 19871-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.05.2026 Co. Ltd. …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI jointly submit that this petition judgment dated 09.01.2025 passed by a of 2023 K.K.Enterprises Vs. In light of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the K.K.Entriprises’s case (supra) and accordingly, eight weeks are granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the Customs, (CESTAT), Chandigarh. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.05.25 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document