M/S GODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
CWP/19871/2020 · 2026-05-21
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20649 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20649 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Union of India and another
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. S.S.Saron, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Advocate, Mr. Sourabh for the respondents.
DEEPAK SIBAL
Learned counsel for the parties be disposed of in terms of Division Bench of this Court Union of India
In light of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the
judgment rendered in weeks are granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
May 21, 2026 vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.174 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19871 Date of Decision :
M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Versus Union of India and another
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. S.S.Saron, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Advocate, Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate, for the respondents.
*** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that this petition be disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 09.01.202 Division Bench of this Court in CWP-12766 Union of India and others. In light of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the
judgment rendered in K.K.Entriprises’s case (supra) weeks are granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
(DEEPAK SIBAL
JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI)
JUDGE
, 2026
ther speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 19871-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.05.2026
Co. Ltd.
…Petitioner
…Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI jointly submit that this petition
judgment dated 09.01.2025 passed by a of 2023 K.K.Enterprises Vs. In light of the above, this petition is disposed of in terms of the K.K.Entriprises’s case (supra) and accordingly, eight weeks are granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the Customs, (CESTAT), Chandigarh.
DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE
VANDANA 2026.05.25 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document