VEENA KUMARI AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
EX.P./1140/2026 · 2026-08-24
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20646 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20646 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:35899 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition
No.1140 of 2026 Decided on: 24.08.2026 _______________________________________________________ Veena Kumari and others
...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Ms. Shivani, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin Rishi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that due to intervening developments she does not want to pursue the present execution petition, since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 24.11.2025 passed in CWP No.18095 of 2025, titled Veena Kumari & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. has been complied with.
2. In view of the above, the present execution petition is
disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending application(s), if 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 any, shall also stand disposed of. 24 th August
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (sk) Judge