Allam Venkateswarlu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/11800/2025 · 2026-01-20
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010235972025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 11800/2025 Between:
1. ALLAM VENKATESWARLU,, S/O.KOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC. FAIR SHOP DEALER F.P. SHOP NO. 0848020 R/O. SURAREDDYPALEM VILLAGE, TANGUTURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TANGUTUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in suspending the authorization of the petitioner without conducting any
2
enquiry and without giving any opportunity of personal hearing as contemplated under Clause 8(4) of the control order 2018 vide proceedings in RC. I/727/2025, dated 19.04.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings in RC. 1/727/2025, dated 19.04.2025 by continuing the petitioner as a F.P shop dealer in Shop No. 0848020, situated Surareddypalem Village, Tanguturu Mandal, Prakasam District by enabling him to supply to the card holders pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt:06-05-2025 passed in WP.No. 11800/2025 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA HRUDAY RAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Ms.Anjanee Priya, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Hruday Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 21st January, 2026
RKS