Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2064 (ALL)

CHHAIL BIHARI v. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/11055/2026 · 2026-05-04

Garima Prashad, Saral Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11055 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Order on Civil Misc. Amendment Application No.2 of 2026. Heard learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The present amendment application has been filed on behalf of applicant/petitioner to correct the description of respondent no.2 in the array of parties. The amendment sought is formal in nature, therefore, the amendment application is allowed. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner is permitted to carry out the necessary amendment in the array of parties during the course of the day. Order on Writ Petition. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to renew the passport in favour of the petitioner forthwith." 3. The petitioner has applied for issuance/renewal of passport. According to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar, Suresh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Chhail Bihari .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) the petitioner, the respondent No.2-Regional Passport Officer, Ghaziabad has neither issued the passport nor has passed any order for grant of issuance/renewal of passport on the ground of pendency of criminal case against the petitioner. 4. A coordinate Bench of this Court in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar Vs. Union of India and others (Writ-C No. 41540 of 2023, decided on 19.01.2024) has held that pendency of criminal proceedings, including at the stage of investigation, does not by itself justify rejection of a passport application, which must be considered in terms of Notification dated 25.08.1993. It has further laid down that upon receipt of information regarding pendency of criminal proceedings from the State authorities, the Regional Passport Office shall intimate the applicant within one week and grant not less than eight weeks to obtain permission from the competent court, during which period the application may be kept pending. Upon submission of such permission, the passport shall be processed expeditiously and without undue delay, preferably within one week. 5. Further, in Harshit Vaish Vs. State of U.P. and another (Criminal Revision No. 524 of 2026, decided on 18.03.2026), this Court, taking note of Office Memorandum dated 06.12.2024 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, has observed that while no separate NOC is required, an order of the competent court permitting the applicant to travel abroad is a necessary precondition for issuance of a passport. The trial court may grant or refuse permission and may impose such conditions as it deems appropriate, including specification of the duration of travel. 6. In view of the above, since the decision in respect of issuance/renewal of the passport is to be taken by respondent no.2, accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2-Regional Passport Officer, Ghaziabad within a period of one month from today. On filing the said representation, respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the application of petitioner for issuance/renewal of passport in the light of the aforesaid judgements within the period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. 7. It is clarified that this Court does not dilute or depart from the mandatory WRIC No. 11055 of 2026 2 framework contained in Notification G.S.R. 570(E) dated 25 August 1993 and the clarificatory Office Memorandum dated 06.12.2024 issued under Section 22 of the Passports Act, 1967, including the stipulation that, where no specific period is fixed by the competent Court, the passport shall be issued for a period of one year. 8. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed off. May 5, 2026 Sattyarth WRIC No. 11055 of 2026 3 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad