Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20634 (AP)

Nakka Subbarao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11453/2025 · 2026-03-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010225582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 11453/2025 Between: 1. NAKKA SUBBARAO, S/O NAKKA GANIRAJU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O 3-17, GOLLAGUDEM, NALLAMADU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-534406. 2. NAKKA MADANA MOHANA RAO, S/O NAKKA SUBBARAO, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O 3-17. NEAR ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE, GOLLAQUDEM, NALLAMADU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-534406. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, ELURU 2 DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE TAHSILDAR OF UNGUTURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT MAIN CANAL (PIPRMC), ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT MAIN CANAL (PIPRMC), SUB-DIVISION NO.2, NALLAJERLA, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT MAIN CANAL (PIPRMC), SUB-DIVISION NO.2, NALLAJERLA, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. MATLA PEDDIRAJU, S/O UNKNOWN R/O 00, GOLLAHUDEM, UNGUTURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-534406 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order Of particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action 8th respondent in not acting upon the direction of 5th respondent proceedings PGRS No. ELR202501091395 Dated 27/03/2025 which issued under the PGRS Grievance Dated 09/01/2025 in not removing respondent over the land of extent Ac. 0.80 cents in Survey No. 1365 at Unguturu Village and Mandal, Eluru District upon the endorsemen by the 5th respondent dated 2/11/2023 vide endorsement No P 509/2023/DT is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural to and also Article 14.15.16.21 and 300-A of the Constitution of Incand consequently direct the 8th respondent to act upon the direction of th respondent vide its proceedings PGRS No. ELR202501091395 27/03/2025 which was issued under the PGRS Grievance Dated 091011225 duly paying compensation to the petitioners as they lost the livelihood due to Polavaram Project in accordance with the law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 8th respondent to act upon the direction of 5th respondent vide its proceedings PGRS No. ELR202501091395 Dated 27/03/2025 which was issued under the PGRS Grievance Dated 09/01/2025 in accordance with the law pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.7 to file Counter Affidavit in W.P.No.11453 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NALLANAGULA LALITHA SREE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: Sri B.K.Chakravathy, learned counsel representing Ms Nallanagulla Lalitha Sree, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 31st March, 2026 RKS