Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20631 (KAR)

SMT TANUJA S R NAIK v. MRS. AKHILESH NAIK Y

CP/88/2026 · 2026-06-11

P Sree Sudha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28222 CP No. 88 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL PETITION NO. 88 OF 2026 (-) BETWEEN: 1. SMT TANUJA S R NAIK W/O AKHILESH NAIK Y AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O BH ROAD, NO.E-02, PB ROAD, FIRE STATION QUATRES, DAVANGERE, KARNATAKA - 577003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P MANJUNATHA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. AKHILESH NAIK Y S/O LATE YATHISH BABU J AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.79TH 3RD FLR, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, B SECTION, AMRUTHANAGAR BENGALURU CENTRAL, KARNATAKA-560092. PRESENT ADDRESS MR. AKHILESH NAIK Y S/O LATE YATHISH BABU J AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, F.D.A. TALUK OFFICE, DAVANAGERE POST, TALUK AND DIST. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.V.M.ADEKAR., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28222 CP No. 88 of 2026 THIS CP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ORDER WITHDRAWING THE MC NO.6799/2025 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, AT BENGALURU TO FAMILY COURT JUDGE, AT DAVANAGERE DIRECTION TO DISPOSE OF THE PETITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL ORDER Heard the arguments of both sides. 2. This Civil Petition is filed by the petitioner/wife for transfer of MC.No.6799/2025, filed by the respondent/husband for divorce before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru to the Family Court, Davanagere as she is working and residing in Davanagere. 3. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even the respondent is working in Davanagere. But the case has been filed at Bengaluru, which is at a distance of about 270 kilometers by bus and 370 kilometers by train, and the travel time is about 10 hours. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28222 CP No. 88 of 2026 4. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that previously the respondent had sought for transfer of his job to Bengaluru on the medical grounds of his mother, but presently he is residing in Davanagere and is trying for transfer to Bengaluru. The said ground is not a reason to be considered by this Court while disposing of the present transfer application. 5. Admittedly, both the parties are residing in Davangere. Therefore, this Court finds that it is just and reasonable to transfer MC.No.6799/2025 filed by the husband for divorce from Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru to the Family Court, Davanagere for the convenience of both parties. Accordingly, Civil Petition is allowed. 6. I.A. No.1/2026 stands closed, in view of the disposal of the main civil petition. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE SHS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8