[2026:RJ-JP:2969] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16503/2025 1. Mukesh S/o Shri Chhotu Regar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Regar Mohalla, Village Gordhanpura, P.s. Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 2. Deepak S/o Shri Ratan Regar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Gordhanpura, P.s. Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this bail application qua accused-petitioner No.1 with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after recording testimony of both injured as well as medical expert. 2. Permission as sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed as withdrawn qua accused-petitioner No.1 Mukesh S/o Shri Chhotu Regar with liberty as prayed for. 4. So far as accused-petitioner No.2 Deepak S/o Shri Ratan Regar is concerned, this bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.174/2025 registered at Police [2026:RJ-JP:2969] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16503/2025] Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 74 & 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. During the course of investigation, offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109(1) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 have been found proved against the petitioner. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. Counsel submits that main allegation of causing injury is against accused- Mukesh. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 6. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. 7. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 8. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that main allegation of causing injury is against accused- Mukesh, as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/ demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 9. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Deepak S/o Shri Ratan Regar, shall [2026:RJ-JP:2969] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16503/2025] be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 10. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /75