Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20626 (AP)

K.B.Jagan Mohan Rao v. B.Raja Shekar

CC/818/2018 · 2026-03-04

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010233412018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 818/2018 Between: 1. K.B.JAGAN MOHAN RAO,, OCCUPATION REGIONAL MANAGER IN CHARGE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD. COMPOUND ROAD, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. B RAJA SHEKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER OCC SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (AGRI) STATE AGRO, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETERAIT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. Y MADHUSUDAN REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, STALIN COMPOUND,7 5TH FLOOR, AUTONAGAR TERMINAL, STREET NO.2, VIJAYAWADA. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Contempt of Court Act for violation of the dated 08-06-2017 passed in W.P.M.P. No. 22407 of 2017 in W.P. No. 18356 of 2017 by His Lordship's Hon'ble Sri. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao for willful disobedience and violations and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAJESWARI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BANDA PRASADA RAO (SC FOR TSAIDC) 2 The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of the interim orders 08.06.2017 passed in W.P.M.P. No.22407 of 2017 in W.P. No.18356 of 2017. 2. When the matter is called, there is no representation on either side. 3. On the perusal of copy of final order dated 21.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.18356 of 2017, placed by the Registry, it appears that the main writ petition itself was dismissed as infructuous, recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above position, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 05.03.2026 GVK 3 63 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.818 of 2018 Date: 05.03.2026 GVK