Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20620 (KAR)

SMT SHYLAJA S M v. SRI B BASANTH KUMAR

CRL.RP/652/2026 · 2026-06-11

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28415 CRL.RP No. 652 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 652 OF 2026 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT SHYLAJA S M W/O. SURESH BABU S.V AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A NO. 42A,SARIGE STREET, GANGAMMA TEMPLE, SARJAPURA, ANEKAL 562125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMESHA D L.,ADVOCATE) AND: SRI B BASANTH KUMAR S/O SRI. BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A 21, 3RD FLOOR, 8TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET,BENGALURU – 560018. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DEVARAJA A,ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DTD 12.03.2026 PASED BY THE HONBLE LVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH-59) AT BENGALURU IN Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28415 CRL.RP No. 652 of 2026 CRL.A.NO.399/2025 IN CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE HONBLE XIII ACJM, AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.2375/2023 DTD 07.02.2025 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 24.02.2026 suspended the sentence subject to revision petitioner depositing 50% of the fine amount (inclusive of the amount already in deposit) within a period of four weeks from today. Though this matter is listed for reporting compliance, none appears for the revision petitioner even in the morning session as well in the afternoon session. 2. Inspite of sufficient opportunity is given, learned counsel for the revision petitioner did not turn up before this Court to make his submission and also not deposited the amount in terms of the conditional order and no application was filed seeking extension of time. In this matter, there is concurrent finding by both the Courts. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28415 CRL.RP No. 652 of 2026 When such being the case, considering this revision petition does not arise. Moreover, the matter is not yet admitted and only the sentence is suspended conditionally. Accordingly, the criminal revision petition stands dismissed in view of non-compliance of the said conditional order. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42