Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20618 (RAJ)

RAMRAJ S/O RAMCHANDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16437/2025 · 2026-01-06

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:221] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16437/2025 1. Ramraj S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 20 K Patan, Police Station K. Patan, District Bundi (Raj.) (Accused Confined In District Jail At Bundi). 2. Pawan Kumar S/o Ramraj, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Matra Road Jodla Ganesh Ji Kai Mander Kai Pass, Ward No. 20, Police Station K. Patan, District Bundi (Raj.) (Accused Confined In District Jail At Bundi). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.365/2025 registered at Police Station Keshorai Patan, District Bundi for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) & 110 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioners is of giving beating to the complainant party. 5. On perusal of the case diary, it is revealed that none of the injury sustained by the complainant party has been opined to be [2026:RJ-JP:221] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16437/2025] dangerous to life and there is no specific overt act has been assigned to the present accused-petitioners in the FIR. The accused-petitioners are said to be in custody since 28.11.2025. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioners and so also the fact that none of the injury sustained by the complainant party has been opined to be dangerous to life, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /190