[2026:RJ-JP:3431] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16005/2025 1. Rajendra Urf Pappu Urf Bajigar S/o Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Ghiloth, Police Station Shahajahanpur, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli). 2. Ramavatar S/o Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Ghiloth, Police Station Shahajahanpur, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli). 3. Sandeep S/o Shri Rohitash, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ghiloth, Police Station Shahajahanpur, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli). 4. Ramanand S/o Shri Rajendra, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ghiloth, Police Station Shahajahanpur, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16679/2025 Ashok Kumar S/o Rohitash, R/o Ghiloth, Police Station Shahajahanpur, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav with Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar, Mr. Virendra Singh and Mr. Samar Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Ms. Anukriti Sharma for Mr. Manu Bhargava [2026:RJ-JP:3431] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16005/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/01/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.159/2025 registered at Police Station-Shahajahanpur, District-Kotputli-Behror for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2) and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present cases. He further submitted that a cross-FIR has been lodged by the petitioners’ side itself and that none of the injuries sustained are dangerous to life. He submitted that the petitioners are behind the bars since 20.11.2025 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the cases may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications. [2026:RJ-JP:3431] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16005/2025] 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Rajendra Urf Pappu Urf Bajigar S/o Shri Jaisingh, Ramavatar S/o Shri Jaisingh, Sandeep S/o Shri Rohitash, Ramanand S/o Shri Rajendra and Ashok Kumar S/o Rohitash shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/103-104