Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20611 (RAJ)

MIMA, W/O BHANWAR LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/20496/2025 · 2026-01-19

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2218] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20496/2025 Mima, W/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Karni Jodhpur, Rajasthan At Present Resident Of Tok Mecha Quarter No. 92, C- Sctor, Naharlagun, Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Ar01-U-9161. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To Government, Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Commissioner Of Transport, Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur Second, Jaipur. 4. District Transport Authority, Shahpura, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20374/2025 Trilok Patni S/o Shri Nirmal Kumar Jain, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Saakin Kalyanpura, Sunder Nagar, Plot No. 106, Sanganer, Jaipur Temporarily Residing At 91, Ward 04 Pidawa Road Soyat Kala, Shajapur, Mp. Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Mp13-Zx- 2849 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To Government, Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Commissioner Of Transport, Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur First, Jaipur. 4. District Transport Authority, Jaipur First, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 19/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some length, upon instructions of his client, seeks permission to [2026:RJ-JP:2218] (2 of 2) [CW-20496/2025] withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, these civil writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. 4. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-287-288