[2026:RJ-JP:7312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16291/2025 Ankit S/o Prakash, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ralliwas Papda, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16292/2025 1. Sakil S/o Jahaj Khan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Peepalkheda Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. At Present In District Jail, Deeg. 2. Rajesh S/o Mangal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Peepalkheda Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. At Present In District Jail, Deeg. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16293/2025 1. Arbaj S/o Sauraf, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Rabbaka, Police Station Naugaon, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg) 2. Vaseem Akram S/o Asraf, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Rabbaka, Police Station Naugaon, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16504/2025 Hasim S/o Sapik, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Jhanjpuri Police Station Kaithwara District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal in (S.B. CRLMB Nos.16291/2025 & 16293/2025) Mr. Harendra Singh in (S.B. CRLMB No. 16292/2025) Mr. Sanjay Khan in (S.B. CRLMB [2026:RJ-JP:7312] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16291/2025] No.16504/2025) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 16/02/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.158/2025 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for offence(s) under Section(s) 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 308(2), 340(2), 61(2)(a) BNS and Section 66-D IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case as they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the offences are triable by Magistrate; the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, they are in custody since 16.11.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from them. He also submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody, hence, they may be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, the fact that the offences are triable by [2026:RJ-JP:7312] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16291/2025] Magistrate, charge-sheet has already been filed and conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these bail applications are allowed and accused- petitioners namely, (1) Ankit S/o Prakash, (2) Sakil S/o Jahaj Khan, (3) Rajesh S/o Mangal, (4) Arbaj S/o Sauraf, (5) Vaseem Akram S/o Asraf and (6) Hasim S/o Sapik are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. The accused - petitioners are directed to mark their presence before the concerned Police Station on the 10th date of every month till conclusion of trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall forward petitioners' attendance report to the trial Court on the same day of each month. In case of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioners for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/8-11