APHC010225482011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 445/2011 Between: 1. MALAPATI JAYA KUMAR, S/O.JOHN DAVID, CHRISTIAN R/O.JOHNPET, PERALA VILLAGE, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. MALAPATI SOBHANA MYLA SOBHA RANI, D/o.Myla Nageswara Rao, Christian, Health Assistant Working as ANM in 104 Health Service, Govt of A.P. O/o.Sattenapally. R/o.Lankelakurapadu Village, Muppalla Mandal, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P D TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 445/2011 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The D.O.P filed by the appellant/husband seeking divorce under Section 10(1) of the Indian Divorce Act was dismissed. 2. The matter could not be settled in the Lok Adalat on account of absence of the parties. 3. Sri T.Kumara Ratnam, learned counsel appearing for the appellant’s counsel on record, submits that he has no instructions from the appellant and, consequently, he is not able to advance the arguments. 4. Considering the nature of the dispute, the afflux of time, and the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in prosecuting the appeal. 5. The C.M.A. is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 03.03.2026 Pab 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. 445 OF 2011 DATE: 03.03.2026 Pab