Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-2531
IN THE HI
116
Raj Kumar
KAP Sinha a
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
violation of Court in CW others’ wher learned coun duly conside reserved cate
2.
being consid admitted tha
order dated
3.
2531-2026
-1-
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
COCP Date o
umar
Versus
inha and others
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. A.K. Yadav and Ms. Suman
for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG,
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present contempt petitio on of order dated 09.04.2024 (Annex CWP-1902-2017, titled as ‘Raj Ku whereby the writ petition was disp d counsel for the respondent-State of P onsidered as and when there will be ed category for physically handicapped
Learned counsel for petitioner s considered. On a Court query, learned ed that no vacancy has occurred afte dated 09.04.2024 (Annexure P-1).
Heard.
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2531-2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026
.…Petitioner
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA Suman Agnihotri, Advocates AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Raj Kumar vs. State of Punjab and s disposed of on the statement of ate of Punjab that petitioner shall be ill be a vacancy to fill up post of capped. ioner submits that petitioner has not earned counsel for the petitioner has ed after passing of the Writ Court
ging Writ and t of ll be t of not has ourt RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.25 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
COCP-2531
4.
question to vacancy.
5.
6.
7.
21.05.2026 rishu
2531-2026
-2-
In view of the above admissio on to consider the case of the petitio
Dismissed.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
mission, it is clear that there is no petitioner as admittedly there is no any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No s no s no RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.25 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.