1 2026:CGHC:22986 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1759 of 2025 Pragya Nayak D/o Shri Mahesh Kumar Nayak Aged About 27 Years R/o S.R. M.I.G. 268, Sec-2, DDU Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - Shri Avinash Champawat, Secretary, General Administration Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, C.G. --- Respondent with CONT No. 247 of 2026 Rahul Kumar Patel S/o Mangalcharan Patel Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 304/k, Near Shankar Munda Talab, Block Colony, Saraipali, P.S. And Tehsil- Saraipali, District Mahasamund C.G. ---Petitioner Versus SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.05.14 18:54:53 +0530 2 1 - Shri Manoj Kumar Pingua Principal Secretary, Department Of Home And Jail Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Shri Himanshu Gupta, Director General, Chhattisgarh Prison And Correctinal Services, Sector-19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) with CONT No. 1751 of 2025 Rana Vijay S/o Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, Aged About 25 Years Present R/o Behind S.P. Office, Nehru Ward, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus 1 - Shri Avinash Champawat Secretary General Administrative Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Clementina Lakra, Under Secretary, General Administrative Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Respective Petitioners : Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Mr. K. Rohan and Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocates For Respective Respondents : Mr. Abhishek Chandra Gupta and Mr. Bennoon, Advocates (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 14/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of 3 the Court’s order dated 29/07/2025, the appointment orders have been issued to the petitioners. 2. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for respective petitioners, on instructions, would submit that the appointment orders have been issued to the petitioners and they have already joined their respective posts. 3. In view of the above, no further proceedings are required to be continued in the present contempt petitions thus, the contempt proceedings are dropped. 4. Accordingly, the present contempt petitions are disposed of. 5. The Rule is discharged. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) Judge $. Bhilwar