Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 206 (CAL)

SATYASADHAN MAJI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/18012/2025 · 2026-02-02

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.02.2026 Item no.23 Ct. no.14 ss IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. 18012 of 2025 Satyasadhan Maji -Vs- The State of West Bengal & ors. Mr. Banshi Badan Maity … for the petitioner 1. The matter is appearing in the list under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’. 2. Inadvertent typographical error has crept into order dated 2nd February, 2026 in paragraph nos.10 and 11 mentioning the nomenclature of respondent no.3 as “the Treasury Officer, Purulia’ instead of ‘the Treasury Officer, Raghunathpur’. 3. Let the nomenclature of the respondent no.3 in paragraph nos.10 and 11 of aforesaid order be read as ‘the Treasury Officer, Raghunathpur’ in place of ‘the Treasury Officer, Purulia’. 4. The aforesaid order is modified to the above extent. 5. The other portion of the said order shall remain unaltered. 6. This order shall form part of order dated 2nd February, 2026. ( Bivas Pattanayak, J.)