Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20593 (DEL)

RAMPAL v. STATE THROUGH SHO BHALSWA DAIRY

BAIL APPLN./3257/2026 · 2026-10-01

Girish Kathpalia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BAIL APPLN. 3257/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 01.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010368222026 + BAIL APPLN. 3257/2026 RAMPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Sharma and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH SHO BHALSWA DAIRY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/SI Sohan Thakur. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail for a period of two months in case FIR No.292/2024 of PS Bhalswa Dairy for offence under Section 21/25/29 of NDPS Act. 2. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail on the ground that he has to participate in the partition of the property left behind by his father. 3. At the outset, learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Sohan Thakur, points out that earlier also, the accused/applicant filed interim bail GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.01 13:53:10 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:01.10.2026 14:16:32 Signature Not Verified BAIL APPLN. 3257/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages application on the same grounds and that application was dismissed as withdrawn before a coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 07.05.2026. That being so, the present application is not even maintainable. 4. In response, learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that despite order dated 07.05.2026 of the coordinate bench, he was not taken to AIIMS for dental treatment. If that be so, the accused/applicant ought to have filed appropriate proceedings, but fresh interim bail application is not maintainable. 5. Even otherwise, participation of the accused/applicant in partition of the inherited property is not such a ground on which he deserves interim bail, ignoring the charges against him. 6. Therefore, the interim bail application is dismissed. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 1, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e 26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.01 13:52:56 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:01.10.2026 14:16:32