IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20054 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-568 Year-2025 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1. Deepak Kumar son of Raghav Singh Resident Of Village- Usari Kumhar Toli, Ps -G. B. Nagar, Dist -Siwan 2. Sonu Singh @ Sonu Kumar Singh son of Raghav singh Resident Of Village- Usari Kumhar Toli, Ps -G. B. Nagar, Dist -Siwan 3. Deepu singh @ Deepu Kumar son of Raghav Singh Resident Of Village- Usari Kumhar Toli, Ps -G. B. Nagar, Dist -Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 29-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 09.12.2025 at 6 A.M. the accused persons came and Raghav assaulted Krishna Nath Pandit by farsha on head, thereafter Deepu assaulted Vishal by farsha on head causing Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20054 of 2026(4) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 injury, while Sonu dashed Rupa on ground and assaulted with lathi on head and also assaulted Suman Kumari by lathi causing injury on hand. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioners and the informant are co-villagers and are neighbours and are having dispute relating to passage, as such an altercation took place in which both side assaulted each other. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and the injury caused has been opined to be simple in nature and on account of dispute relating to passage, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20054 of 2026(4) dt.29-06-2026 3/3 counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No.568 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T