IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40177 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2026 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Sah Sajid @ Sajid Sah @ Shah Sajid @ Sajeed Sah Son of Sah Kasim @ Kasim Sah Resident of Village- Amhara, Ward No. -12, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. 2. Sah Jahid @ Jahid Sah @ Shah Jahid @ Jahid Shah S/o- Sah Kasim @ Kasim Sah Resident of Village- Amhara, Ward No. -12, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 155 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that petitioner no. 1 has assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant and petitioner no. 2 has assaulted with an iron rod on his back and whole of the body. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40177 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that there is also a counter-version of the present case. He further submits that from perusal of the injury report of the informant, namely, Manoj Mandal, it transpires that the informant sustained two injuries: (i) 5 cm cut injury on the scalp caused by a sharp object, and (ii) trauma to the left shoulder. The doctor has opined that both injuries are simple in nature. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since 19.03.2026. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 155 of 2026. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T