Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20584 (JHR)

RUPESH THAKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6607/2026 · 2026-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:21297] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6607 of 2026 ------ 1. Rupesh Thakur, aged about 19 years, S/o Paras Thakur. 2. Chhotan Thakur, aged about 42 years, S/o Prambachan Thakur, Both petitioner no. 1 and 2 are R/o Village- Pachaduman, P.O. + P.S.- Bhawnathpur, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Vishwajeet Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Ketar P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations against the petitioners are that the petitioners were the members of unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly, attempted to murder Golu Choudhary and Pawan Kumar Sah by assaulting them. It is next submitted that the assault was made with lathi- Danda and iron fighter. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 21.05.2026 as mentioned in para-14 and have no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection with Ketar P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17 /07/2026 Amar/