Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2026:HHC:32463 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.297 of 2026 Date of Decision: 05.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Ajay Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, wherein it has been stated that in compliance to judgment dated 02.12.2025, passed in CWP No.18901 of 2025, the case of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the learned Deputy Director of School Education, Mandi, District Mandi, being a cadre controlling authority of Shastri Teacher, vide office order dated 15.07.2026, Annexure R-2/1. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:32463
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged.
3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail the office order dated 15.07.2026, in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 05, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)