Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20571 (PAT)

Dhiraj Kumar @ Alok Prakash v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./39566/2026 · 2026-06-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39566 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2026 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Dhiraj Kumar @ Alok Prakash S/O Suresh Prasad Yadav R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 2. Niraj Kumar S/O Suresh Prasad Yadav R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 3. Aman Kumar S/O Chandra Nath Prasad R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 4. Raja Kumar S/O Alok Prasad Dhiraj @ D. Kr. @ Dheeraj Kumar R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 5. Aditya Kumar S/O Alok Prasad Dhiraj @ D. Kr. @ Dheeraj Kumar R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 6. Golu Kumar S/O Niraj Kumar R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 7. Gaurav Kumar @ Gaurav Raj S/O Niraj Kumar R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 8. Renu Kumari D/O Alok Prasad Dhiraj @ Dheeraj Kumar R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 9. Rinku Devi D/O Jhaptti Ray R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 10. Rubi Devi W/O Niraj Yadav R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. 11. Sweta Devi @ Sweta Kumari D/O Sahdev Prasad R/O Saristabad, Purvi Tola, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State . 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39566 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/3 115(2), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 74, 351(2), 352 of BNS. 3. The prosecution case in brief, is that on 28.01.2026, when father of informant was going to cowshed, all the F.I.R. named accused persons armed with various weapons came and started assaulting him. Upon hulla, when infomrant reached there, she was also assaulted by them. It is further alleged that accused persons attempted to outrage her modesty. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence as alleged. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. No specific allegation is attributed against them. As a matter of fact, in order to save skin from Gardanibagh PS Case No. 84 of 2026, informant lodged this false and concocted case against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5 . Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition . 6 Considering the general and omnibus allegation against these petitioner, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39566 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Patna, in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 85 of 2026 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 . Koushik/Alok Raj- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T