Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20563 (RAJ)

KAMAL KISHOR SUMAN S/O RADHEYSHYAM SUMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16474/2025 · 2026-01-06

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:184] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16474/2025 Kamal Kishor Suman S/o Radheyshyam Suman, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Rawan Police Station Chipabarod, District Baran, Rajasthan. At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chabra. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.249/2025 registered with the Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran for offence under Sections 130(1) & 331(8) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary. 4. The accused-petitioner has been implicated as an accused in this case with the add of Section 61 (2) of B.N.S., 2023. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he is a part of conspiracy with other accused persons in committing the [2026:RJ-JP:184] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16474/2025] main offence. The learned Trial Court after considering the evidence collected during investigation, has framed charges against accused-petitioner for offence punishable under Sections 61(2), 331(8)/61(2), 310(3)/61(2) and 103/61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 5. The accused-petitioner is said to have been in custody since 07.08.2025 and as per the learned Public Prosecutor, the evidence of conspiracy against the petitioner with other accused persons is of having conversation with other accused persons for last two to three days, as is evident from the call details of cell phone of the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor has also submitted that as per the interrogation note also, the accused- petitioner is a part of conspiracy. The accused-petitioner has been implicated in this case with the add of Section 61(2) of B.N.S. on the basis of his call details and is in custody since 07.08.2025. 6. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the petitioner has been implicated in this case as a part of conspiracy and possibility of false implication cannot be ruled out at this stage, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:184] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16474/2025] Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /195