Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20562 (BOM)

BAKSU RTAN PATIL DIED D/H TANAJIBAKSU PATIL AND ORS v. SUNIL PAUDWAL ANDORS

CP/347/2009 · 2026-10-13

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

347.09CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 347 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4607 OF 2007 BAKSU RTAN PATIL DIED D/H TANAJIBAKSU PATIL & OTHERS VERSUS SUNIL PAUDWAL & OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 13.10.2026 ORDER : [PER : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.] 1] None for the petitioners. 2] In the order under contempt, respondent no.4 was directed to make payment of compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act. Respondent no.3 has filed affidavit-in-reply stating that as soon as the amount is sanctioned from the Government, it will be paid to the petitioners immediately. After 11.03.2014, neither the petitioners have circulated the present petition, nor respondents have brought subsequent developments on 2026:BHC-AUG:48957 347.09CP 2 record in relation to the compliance of the subject matter. It seems that during pendency of the present Contempt Petition, purpose of the petitioner musts have been served and they might have received the amount. 3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same is disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC