Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20561 (AP)

Kunjam Krishna Dora v. The State of Andhra Pradesh.

WP/9517/2018 · 2026-02-12

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010218212018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9517/2018 Between: 1. KUNJAM KRISHNA DORA,, S/O.NAGANNA DORA,AGE 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. PEDA MUNAKANAGADDAVILLAGE, ADDATEEGALA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL.SECRETARY , REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, ADDATEEGALA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, ADDATEEGALA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not taking steps to survey and fix up the boundaries in respect of the land of an extent of Ac.2.49 cents each in Sy.Nos.28/1 and 28/2 situated in Peda Munakanagadda Village, Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District inspite of making online applications through meeseva as wholly illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent 2 and 3 to consider the online application made by the petitioner to survey and fix up the 2 JS,J W.P.No.9517/2018 boundaries in respect of the above mentioned land of the petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the online application made by the petitioner for survey and fix up the boundaries in respect of the.land to an extent of Ac.2.49 cents each in Sy.Nos.28/1 and 28/2 situated in Peda Munakanagadda Village, Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.9517/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file appeal before the competent authority against the survey report bearing No.Rc.1/12/2026 dated 24.01.2026, issued by the 2nd respondent. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the competent authority against the survey report bearing No.Rc.1/12/2026 dated 24.01.2026, issued by the 2nd respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.02.2026 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.9517/2018 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9517/2018 Dated: 13.02.2026 RSD