Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20557 (JHR)

MS GANESH RAM DOKANIA REPRESENTE THROUGH ITS ONE OF THE PARTNERS NAMELY SRI SANJAY KUMAR GIRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS

WPC/1028/2014 · 2026-07-14

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20871] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1028 of 2014 ---- M/s Ganesh Ram Dokania, a Partnership Firm duly registered under the provisions of the Partnership Act, 1932, represent through its one of the partners namely Sri Sanjay Kumar Giri, son of late Sakaldeo Giri, resident of Flat No.4D, Sai Astha Apartment, Bariatu, PO and PS Bariatu, Town and District Ranchi .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1.The State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, Project Building, Dhurwa, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagarnathpur, Town and District Ranchi 2.The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagannathpur Town and District Ranchi 3.The Engineer-In-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, Town and District Ranchi 4.The Chief Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, Town and District Ranchi 5.The Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Dhanbad .... Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Miss Aditi Raj, A.C. to Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Gaurang Jajodia, Advocate ---- 39/14.07.2026 In this writ petition, challenge has been made for quashing of Minutes of Meeting dated 05.02.2014 by which the decision has been taken to rescind the contract executed with the petitioner and for preparation of DPR for the remaining work. 2. Miss Aditi Raj, the learned Associate Counsel to Mr. Sachin Kumar, who is advocate on record on behalf of the petitioner, on his instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent State has got no objection for the same. 4. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 14.07.2026 SI/