NAVEEN CHAUDHARY URF LUKKA S/O SHRI DESHRAJ CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3631/2026 · 2026-04-01
Praveer Bhatnagar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2054 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2054 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13633] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3631/2026
1. Naveen Chaudhary Urf Lukka S/o Shri Deshraj Chaudhary, R/o Village Baseri Police Station Uchchain Bharatpur At Present R/o House No. 58 DHA 06 Krishna Apartment Sector 28 Pratap Nagar Police Station Pratap Nagar Jaipur East (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur Raj.)
2. Ravi Mahavar S/o Shri Kanhiya Lal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Matlana Police Station Lalsot District Dausa (At Present Confined Central Jail Jaipur Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 01/04/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the bail application filed on behalf of petitioner No.2-Ravi Mahavar. Accordingly, the bail application of petitioner No.2-Ravi Mahavar, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
2. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka. The accused-petitioner No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka has been arrested in connection with FIR No.1022/2025 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) Rajasthan for the offence(s) under Section 303(2) of BNS.
[2026:RJ-JP:13633] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3631/2026]
3.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner No.1 submits that the accused-petitioner No.1 has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner No.1 is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner No.1, may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner No.1 is a habitual offender and against him five criminal cases are pending and it is an admitted fact that the charge-sheet has been submitted, therefore, the bail application of the accused petitioner No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka, may be dismissed. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka and the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka, on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application qua petitioner No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Naveen Chaudhary Urf Lukka S/o Shri Deshraj Chaudhary, in connection with FIR No.1022/2025 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) Rajasthan, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two
[2026:RJ-JP:13633] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3631/2026] sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. The accused-petitioner- No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay.
In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The accused-petitioner No.1 Naveen Chaudhary @ Lukka is
directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court.
10. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-50