Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2053 (CAL)

JOYDEB MAITY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/4574/2026 · 2026-03-24

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

6. 6. (DL) (DL) 24.03.2026 24.03.2026 Ct. No. 05 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 4574 OF 2026 JOYDEB MAITY VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Manna, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Abdul Hamid Molla, Adv. Ms. Tuhina Parvin-I, Adv. …for the State Mr. Shamim Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Goutam Mondal, Adv. …for the Private Respondents 1. Matter is heard in presence of the learned advocates representing the petitioner, State respondents and private respondents. 2. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that petitioner is facing difficulty in erecting construction on the land in question due to obstruction made by the private respondents and prayer is made for direction upon the concerned police authorities to provide protection which would facilitate the petitioner to erect boundary wall on the land. 3. Learned advocate representing the private respondents has opposed this writ petition on the score that previously concerning the land in question another writ petition was filed by the petitioner being WPA 21980 of 2025 and same was disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench on 24th September, 2025. [2] 4. Learned advocate representing the state respondents has filed a communication dated 6th March, 2026 of Inspector-in-Charge, Egra Police Station, Purba Medinipur and same is taken on record. 5. Since issue was considered by a Co-ordinate Bench and the writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 24th September, 2025, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 6. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon usual undertakings. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)