BHURALAL ALIAS BHURA S/O GHANSHYAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1026/2026 · 2026-04-08
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14578] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1026/2026 Bhuralal Alias Bhura S/o Ghanshyam, R/o Rawan, Police Station Chhipabarod, Distt. Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.K. Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sriram Dhaka, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 08/04/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.249/2025 registered with the Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran for offence under Sections 103(1), 331(8) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary.
4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he is a part of conspiracy with other accused persons in committing the main offence. The accused-petitioner is said to have been in custody since long and as per the learned Public Prosecutor, the evidence of conspiracy against the petitioner with other accused persons is of having conversation with other accused persons for
[2026:RJ-JP:14578] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1026/2026] last two to three days, as is evident from the call details of cell phone of the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor has also submitted that as per the interrogation note also, the accused petitioner is a part of conspiracy.
6. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that co-accused namely Kamal Kishor Suman has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.01.2026 and more particularly the fact that the petitioner has been implicated in this case as a part of conspiracy and possibility of false implication cannot be ruled out at this stage, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /28