CS(COMM) 362/2026 $~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 362/2026, I.As. 9228/2026, 9229/2026 LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL, INC & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Daswani, Ms. Saumya Bajpai and Ms. Pranjal Dhankar, Advocates. versus DUKOLL INDIA .....Defendant Through: Ms. Archana Sahadeva and Mr. Harshit Bhoi Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 07.04.2026 1. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from publishing, circulating, communicating to the public or causing to be published, circulated or communicated, whether through the internet, social media platforms, websites, digital media, print media, electronic media or any other medium whatsoever, any advertisement, post, representation or statement that disparages, denigrates or falsely portrays Plaintiffs’ product SP- 100 epoxy grout as inferior, defective or otherwise lacking in protective performance, including the impugned advertisement and any other content of a similar nature. 2. Ms. Archana Sahadeva, learned counsel appearing on advance copy of the suit, on instructions, submits that the impugned post, which is at page This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 13:40:38 CS(COMM) 362/2026 No. 61 of the paper book for ready reference, has been taken down from all the platforms and no cause of action survives in present suit. She further submits that the action to take down the impugned advertisement is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Defendant that the post was non-disparaging. 3. Learned counsel for the Plaintiffs refutes the submission that the impugned advertisement was non-disparaging or non-denigrating, however, in light of the fact that the impugned advertisement has been taken down, he submits on instructions that the suit be disposed of since the relief claimed stands redressed. 4. Considering that the impugned advertisement has been taken down by the Defendant, the suit stands disposed of along with pending applications. Plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870. 5. Court appreciates the efforts put in by both the parties and their respective counsels in facilitating expeditious disposal of the suit. JYOTI SINGH, J APRIL 7, 2026/RW This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 13:40:38