Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20509 (HP)

Pinkoo and anr v. Duni Chand and others

CMP.M/1085/2026 · 2026-08-21

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Pinkoo & Another versus Duni Chand & Others RSA No. of 2026 21.08.2026 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. CMP(M) No.1 085 of 2026 On the last date of hearing, inadvertently, presence of Mr. Reham Tullah, Advocate vice Mr. Devender K. Sharma, has been marked for all the respondents, whereas, he has put appearance only on behalf of respondent No.1. As per the report of the Registry, respondents No.2 to 4 were served for 14.08.2026. There is no appearance on their behalf. Further wait is not justifiable. In view of the no objection made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, the delay as occurred in filing the main appeal is ordered to be condoned. The application stands disposed of. RSA No. of 2026 Be registered. Let notice be issued to respondents No.2 to 4 for 25th September, 2026, on taking steps within a period of seven days. (Virender Singh) August 21, 2026 (ps) Judge