1 APHC010218592019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 9643/2019 Between: 1. JASTI LAXMI MEENA, W/O BADRI NAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS R/O D.NO. 13/290A, RAJENDRA NAGAR, GUDIVADA KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 521301 ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, DR. RAJENDER PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI 110001 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, ANDHRA PRADESH D.NO. 29-7- 33, GOLI COMPLEX, OPPOSITE HASINI HOSPITAL, VISHNU VARDHANA RAO STREET, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in so far as deactivating the Director Identification Number (DIN) of the Petitioner (Jasti Lakshmi Meena DIN 05190744) (deactivation with the effect from 01- 11-2016 to 31-10-2021) and listing the name as Disqualified Director and thereby restricting the Petitioner to continue as Director of the Companies and/or get appoint or reappointed as Director of any Company and file 2 statutory returns i.e., annual returns and financial statements of the companies in which she is Director as arbitrary, illegal without jurisdiction contrary to the provision of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule I1 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules 2014 violation of the principles of natural justices besides violating the petitioner rights guaranteed under Article 14 and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to stay the disabling and restore the Director Identification Number (DIN) of the Petitioner (Jasti La.kshmi Meena - DIN# 05190744), of Petitioner so as to enable them to continue as Director of the Companies and/or get appoint or reappointed as Director of any Company and file statutory returns i.e., annual returns and financial statements of the active companies in which he is the director without any interference and earn remuneration for their live hood by serving the company as Director and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SETHU RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.9643 OF 2019 O R D E R:- On 09.03.2026 and 23.03.2026 there is no representation for the petitioner. To give one more opportunity to the petitioner, this case is posted to 30.03.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute this Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date : 31.03.2026 TM 4 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 9643/2019 Date : 31.03.2026 TM