- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28145 CRL.RP No. 209 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.209 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. H.S. TRADERS, BANK COLONY, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, SHAINSHANAGARA, KOLAR-563101, RERPSENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI S.B. MUBARAK, S/O LATE MASTHAN SAB B.K. AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. ADDRESS WRONGLY MENTIONED AS ROYAL RESIDENCE, RASHEED NAGAR, PATEL ROAD. OPP. KONDARAJANAHALLI DARGA, KOLAR-563101 REPRSENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. S.B. MUBARAK, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, EX-MUNICIPAL PRESIDENT KOLAR TOWN-563 101. ALSO AT M/S. M.S. POULTRY BREEDERS, TAVAREKERE, THIPPASANDRA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562120 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESH BABU B.N., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28145 CRL.RP No. 209 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT 7TH CROSS, KARANJIKATTE, KADRIPURA ROAD, KOLAR-563101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.S.HARINATH, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.39/2024 BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR, DATED 07.12.2024 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT PASSED IN CC.NO.882/2018 DATED 04.03.2024 BY THE FIRST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KOLAR BY ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the revision petitioner is absent. 2. This Court vide order dated 12.02.2025 suspended the sentence, subject to depositing 50% of the cheque amount deducting the amount already paid before the Trial Court within four weeks and the same has not been complied with. This - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28145 CRL.RP No. 209 of 2025 matter is of the year 2025 and not yet admitted. Hence, the question of considering the revision petition does not arise, in view of non-compliance of conditional order passed by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. 4. The Registry is directed to send the records to the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12