( 2026:JHHC:21143 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 858 of 2026 ------ 1. Bhim Kumar @ Bhim Ram, aged about 38 years, 2. Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Ram, aged about 25 years Both sons of Sri Gariban Ram, resident of Village-Haidar Nagar, Tola Ganjpar, P.O. & P.S.-Haidar Nagar, Dist.- Palamau (Jharkhand) … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Anku Kumar Singh, aged about 47 years, son of late Suresh Singh, resident of Village-Babhamdih, P.O. & P.S.-Haidar Nagar, Dist.-Palamau … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Anjana Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate ------ Order No.03 Dated- 17.07.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026 was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order of filing requisites. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence and bona fide mistake, the said requisites could not be filed within the stipulated time, hence, the same resulted in dismissal of Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in this Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026 and unless Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026 is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioners are deliberately delaying the matter and harassing the opposite party no.2 by lingering the same. Hence, the opposite party no.2 be adequately compensated with costs. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- by the petitioners to the opposite party no.2 through the counsel appearing in the record within four weeks, failing which, this conditional order shall not be given effect to and this criminal miscellaneous petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. In case, the petitioner files the proof of payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- by the petitioners to the opposite party no.2 through the counsel appearing in the record within four weeks, list Cr.M.P. No. 465 of 2026 under the appropriate heading after a week before the appropriate Bench. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17.07.2026 Gunjan-