Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20505 (RAJ)

RAJKUMAR HADA S/O LATE SHRI ASHOK KUMAR HADA v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

CW/19483/2025 · 2026-02-05

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5462] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19483/2025 Rajkumar Hada S/o Late Shri Ashok Kumar Hada, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 1675, Jai Lal Munshi Ka Rasta Chandpole Bazar Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302001 2. The Executive Director Administration RSRTC, Head Office Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302001 3. The Audit Incharge Rsrtc, Head Office Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan)- 302001 4. The Chief Manager. R.S.R.T.C Jaipur, Depot Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Praveer Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 05/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset submitted that against the impugned order, petitioner has already filed one representation in the light of judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8810/2014 in the case of Tara Chand Vs. RSRTC & Anr. decided on 25.01.2017. 2. Learned counsel submits that the respondents be directed to decide representation strictly in accordance with law. [2026:RJ-JP:5462] (2 of 2) [CW-19483/2025] 3. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit fresh representation highlighting his grievances along with all necessary documents/judgments before the Managing Director of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, who shall consider and decide the representation by a speaking order within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of representation of this order. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/86