Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20504 (PNJ)

TILAK RAJ v. GURDEEP SINGH

COCP/1497/2026 · 2026-05-19

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[226] Tilak Raj Gurdeep Si Council, Na Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] alleges dis by the Wri [2] Order pass judgment o [3] contempt p [4] appropriate case the n [5] disposed o 19.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-149 Date of De versu eep Singh, Executive Engineer, Muni cil, Nangal, District Ropar HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Goklaney, Advocate for the pe Mr. H.S. Randhawa, Advocate **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of the present con es disobedience of Order dated 12.1 he Writ Court in CWP No.4377-2022 The present contempt petitio er passed by the LPA Bench where ment of which the petitioner seeks c No further order is require empt petition. The same is ordered t However, liberty is granted opriate application seeking revival the need arises. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 1497-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 19.05.2026 …Petitioner ersus Municipal ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN aney, Advocate and Mr. Ashish the petitioner. vocate for the respondent. nt contempt petition, the petitione ed 12.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) passe 2022. petition is dismissed in view of whereby operation and effect of th eeks compliance has been stayed. equired to be passed in the presen dered to be dismissed at this stage. ranted to the petitioner to move a evival of the contempt petition, i us application(s), if any, stand (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No etitioner ) passed of the t of the ed. present tage. ove an ion, in , stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.20 11:22 I agree to specified portions of this document